Governo Trump afirma que EUA não querem possuir participação na Nvidia - Impactos no setor de criptomoedas?
Washington deixa claro: não há interesse federal em ações da gigante de chips. Uma decisão que reverbera no coração do ecossistema cripto.
O que significa para miners e investidores
A Nvidia continua sendo peça fundamental na corrida por poder de processamento - seja para IA ou mineração de criptomoedas. A ausência do governo como acionista majoritário mantém o mercado livre, mas também mais volátil.
Os mesmos chips que alimentam ChatGPT hoje podem estar minerando Ethereum amanhã - e Washington prefere assistir de camarote. Típico: reguladores que não entendem tecnologia tentando ditar regras para inovação.
Enquanto isso, no mundo real, GPUs da Nvidia continuam sendo ouro digital para quem busca lucrar com blockchains. O governo não quer participar? Ótimo - mais oportunidades para investidores privados.
Bessent says future equity deals may target other U.S. industries
Pressed by Bartiromo on whether Trump would back a stake in Nvidia, Bessent made the administration’s position clear: “I don’t think Nvidia needs financial support. So, you know, that that seems not on the table right now.” But he didn’t rule out other industries.
“Could there be other industries where we’re reshaping—something like shipbuilding? Sure. There could be things like that. And these are critical industries that we have to be self-sufficient in the United States.”
Bessent didn’t try to sell it as just another industrial strategy. He tied it directly to national survival, saying the COVID-19 pandemic showed how fragile the U.S. was. He called the pandemic a “beta” test for a kinetic war, pointing to America’s deep reliance on foreign manufacturing.
“Think about it, 80-90% of the precursor pharma products are made overseas. And that’s just unacceptable,” Bessent said. “As we saw during COVID, the manufacturing countries will keep it for themselves.”
The Intel move has already stirred up Republican backlash, with lawmakers split. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., didn’t hold back: “The U.S. federal government should not be buying companies,” he told Fox News Digital.
Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., one of the CHIPS Act’s lead sponsors, also criticized the strategy. “It was not the intent of the law, you know, an equity stake to be taken,” Young said. “But it was the intent to ensure that we enhance our economic security and national security, which is the objective that they are trying, that the administration is trying to advance.”
The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.
