SEC vs Binance Lawsuit: Binance was Faced with 13 Separate Charges (Updated)

In a significant development, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a comprehensive lawsuit against Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. The lawsuit, filed in federal court on Monday, June 5, details 13 separate allegations and accuses Binance of mismanagement of customer funds and deception towards regulators and investors about its operations.

 

“Through thirteen charges, we allege that Zhao and Binance entities engaged in an extensive web of deception, conflicts of interest, lack of disclosure, and calculated evasion of the law,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said.

 

“As alleged, Zhao and Binance misled investors about their risk controls and corrupted trading volumes while actively concealing who was operating the platform, the manipulative trading of its affiliated market maker, and even where and with whom investor funds and crypto assets were custodied.”

 

The SEC vs Binance Lawsuit

According to the SEC, Binance has been accused of intermingling customer funds amounting to billions of dollars and covertly transferring them to a distinct company, Merit Peak Limited. This company is reportedly under the control of Binance’s founder, Changpeng Zhao, who is widely known in the cryptocurrency world as “C.Z.”

 

The charges against Binance extend to allegations of misleading investors about the robustness of its systems designed to identify and curb manipulative trading. The SEC further asserts that Binance failed to implement adequate measures to prevent U.S. investors from accessing its unregulated exchange.

 

The legal complaint also states that the SEC has identified several individual tokens which it believes to be securities, which include BNB, BUSD, SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, ATOM, ALGO, COTI, SAND (The Sandbox), MANA (Decentraland), AXS (Axie Infinity).

 

Download App for Android

Download App for iOS

Binance’s Response

Taking to Twitter to address the allegations, Zhao indicated that he had not yet received the complaint and that the company would respond once it does. Initially, their team said that they were “standing by, ensuring systems are stable, including withdrawals and deposits.”

 

Zhao eventually tweeted out the company’s official response to the allegations, claiming that the SEC aims to “unilaterally define” the shape of the crypto market.

 

“We are disappointed that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chose to file a complaint today against Binance,” the company explained in a blog post addressing the issue. “From the start, we have actively cooperated with the SEC’s investigations and have worked hard to answer their questions and address their concerns.”

 

“Unfortunately, the SEC’s refusal to productively engage with us is just another example of the Commission’s misguided and conscious refusal to provide much-needed clarity and guidance to the digital asset industry,” the post continued.

 

“Today’s action is another in a line of examples where, as with other crypto projects facing similar suits, the Commission has determined to regulate with the blunt weapons of enforcement and litigation rather than the thoughtful, nuanced approach demanded by this dynamic and complex technology.”

 

What Does This Mean for Binance?

This SEC vs Binance lawsuit is the latest in a series of actions by U.S. regulators ostensibly aimed at bringing order to a largely unregulated cryptocurrency trading space. While regulators’ seeming objective is to ensure that major players in the industry adhere to U.S. laws, there has been much debate and dissent, even within the SEC’s own leadership, as to whether or not the organization’s “regulation by enforcement” policy is either effective or fair.

 

Binance, much like its competitor Coinbase, has been grappling with mounting legal pressure in the face of this approach. The Justice Department is currently investigating the former for potential money-laundering violations. Additionally, Binance’s external auditing firm, Mazars, severed ties with the company following its decision to cease business with cryptocurrency companies last year. Binance’s dominance in the cryptocurrency market has also been waning, though it remains the number one exchange by volume in the market.

 

In an attempt to maintain its reputation and avoid complications with the SEC, Binance has brought on board several new compliance officials in the last year, including a former federal prosecutor who is now leading its compliance operation.

 

In the SEC statement announcing the charges, Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s enforcement division, stated, “We allege that Zhao and the Binance entities not only knew the rules of the road, but they also consciously chose to evade them and put their customers and investors at risk.”

 

The action by the SEC comes just over a month after the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) initiated its own civil enforcement action against Binance and Zhao, in which the CFTC is seeking a lifetime ban on Zhao from conducting business within its jurisdiction. It also aims to permanently expel Binance from the United States.

 

Download App for Android

Download App for iOS

SEC Proposed to Freeze Binance.US

Following the lawsuit’s issuance, the SEC issued an emergency motion to freeze assets held by Binance.US on Tuesday. The proposed freeze would affect BAM Management US Holdings and BAM Trading Services, two companies involved in Binance.US’s operations.

 

The motion also requests “the repatriation and other specified relief concerning the custody and control of fiat currency and crypto assets deposited, held, traded, and/or accrued by customers on the Binance.US crypto asset trading platform,” which would involve transferring assets back to the United States.

 

If the motion is granted, Binance will have to prove to the court why the injunction (which caused it to cease operations) should not be issued. It would also prevent the Binance defendants named in the lawsuit from concealing or destroying relevant records. The motion suggests that the SEC wants to expedite the legal process on the grounds that Binance’s alleged conduct is itself willing to engage in illegal actions.

 

 

Recommended for you:

XRP Price Prediction $500: Can XRP Reach $500 Dollars?

Pikamoon Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

How to Buy Pikamoon? Is It a Good Buy?

Is Pi Network Legit Or Scam: Pi Cryptocurrency Real or Fake?

Will Pi Network Ever Launch? What Stage is Pi Network Now?

Pi Coin Price Prediction: Will Pi Ever Be Worth Money?

Gold Price Predictions for Next 5 Years

Silver Price Predictions for Next 5 Years

Luna Classic Price Prediction: Will Luna Classic Reach $1?

PulseX Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030: Can PulseX Reach $1?

Pepe Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Will Shiba Inu Reach 1 Cent?

Sui (SUI) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Pulsechain Launch: Everything You Need to Know

Stellar Lumens (XLM) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

HBAR Price Prediction 2025, 2030

Milady Meme Coin (LADYS) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Ethereum Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction 2023, 2024, 2025, 2030

Will Cardano Reach $100?

Cardano (ADA) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Gala (GALA) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Polkadot (DOT) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Pulsechain Mainnet Goes Live – What Exactly is Pulsechain?

Pulsechain (PLS) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Can Solana Reach $1,000? Solana Price Prediction

JasmyCoin (JASMY) Price Prediction

Core DAO Airdrop is Now Available, How to Claim It?

Core DAO (CORE) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Wild Cash App: Answer Quiz to Earn $HOOK

The Sandbox Price Prediction 2025, 2030

Polygon (MATIC) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Arbitrum (ARB) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Wall Street Memes (WSM) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

Litecoin (LTC) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030

VeChain (VET) Price Prediction 2023, 2025, 2030